In which case was the "Reasonableness Standard" set by the US Supreme Court?

The "Reasonableness Standard" was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Graham v. Connor. This decision set a critical precedent for evaluating the use of force by law enforcement officers, indicating that such evaluations should be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, rather than with the benefit of hindsight. The court emphasized that the "reasonableness" of an officer's actions must be balanced against the need for the use of force in a particular situation, accounting for the facts and circumstances confronting the officer at that moment. This standard has been instrumental in guiding law enforcement practices and legal assessments of police conduct.

In this context, other cases listed do not establish the "Reasonableness Standard" as Graham v. Connor does. For instance, Miranda v. Arizona is focused on the rights of individuals in police custody and the requirement for officers to inform them of those rights, while the other choices do not relate to the same legal principles governing the use of force by police.