What must an officer consider before using deadly force?

In assessing the use of deadly force, it is essential for an officer to consider whether de-escalation tactics have been attempted or are not feasible. De-escalation refers to the methods officers can use to diffuse a potentially dangerous situation and prevent the need for lethal action. These tactics are critical as they align with the principles of using force as a last resort. Employing de-escalation strategies demonstrates an officer's commitment to preserving life and mitigating conflict without resorting to deadly means.

In situations where de-escalation is possible, it provides an opportunity to resolve the situation without harm. Conversely, if de-escalation tactics have been attempted and failed, or if the circumstances do not allow for these tactics to be effectively implemented, the immediate context of the threat may justify the use of deadly force in order to protect the officer or others from serious harm.

Considering an officer's feelings about the suspect or whether the incident is being recorded does not play a pivotal role in the decision to use deadly force. These factors, while relevant in the broader context of an officer's behavior and accountability, do not directly address the immediate assessment of threat and the necessity of force. Additionally, the presence of a weapon is certainly relevant, but the decision-making process